Court Adopts Low-End Sentence After Defense Mitigation in Federal Human Smuggling Case
At a federal sentencing involving human smuggling (8 U.S.C. § 1324), the government argued for a high-end guidelines sentence. Partner James P. Whalen countered with a detailed mitigation presentation—documenting our client’s background, life circumstances, and rehabilitative prospects—and grounded it in the law governing downward departures and variances. The court commended the defense and imposed a low-end sentence. With credit and remaining time considered, our client now faces approximately four months left to serve.
Sentencing is a critical phase in federal cases. Persuasive mitigation, careful record-building, and clear legal theory can meaningfully influence the outcome.
If you or a loved one is facing a federal investigation or sentencing, contact Whalen Law Office to request a confidential consultation.